Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts

Saturday, 6 May 2017

Alternative Political Elite?

When the Dergue collapsed in 1991 and the EPLF, TPLF, and OLF rode into power, we feared the worst. After all, the EPLF, TPLF, and OLF were nothing but ethnic nationalist rebels – shiftas – as far as we were concerned, bent on destroying or breaking apart Ethiopia.

Now, 26 years later, Ethiopia is still alive – yes, with a lot of problems – but still alive. Even though Eritrea separated and an unadvised ethnicist constitution was enacted, Ethiopia has survived. It has survived in large part because its population, in aggregate, was and remains nationalist and patriotic enough to resist the extremes of ethnic nationalism advocated by the TPLF. The TPLF tried, like Ataturk in Turkey, to drag the population kicking and screaming towards something it did not believe in, in this case, ethnic nationalism, but this only worked somewhat. To a large extent, Ethiopianism is alive and well.

Indeed, we can say that the Ethiopian people have moderated the TPLF. Recall that in the early 1990’s, there was no such thing as a ‘narrow nationalist’ – only ‘chauvinists’. Let alone Oromos, even Tigreans were encouraged by the TPLF to identify as ‘Tigrean first and Ethiopian second’. Today there is no such thing. Much of the TPLF now sees the extreme ethnic nationalism it once espoused as an albatross around its neck.

If commendation were possible, the Ethiopian people ought to be commended for this. It is only their strong nationalism and patriotism that has averted disaster and kept the country alive. But what is remarkable is that they did all this without an elite – it was all at the grassroots level. As I said above, in 1991, the EPLF, TPLF, and OLF were the political parties with power. There was no Ethiopian nationalist or Ethiopianist elite to speak of. After all, this elite had committed a long suicide – from 1960 when Haile Selassie’s elite first began to develop suicidal impulses – to the culmination in 1991. Thus when the EPLF, TPLF, and OLF in 1991 began to discuss their future in power, there was no nationalist elite – political or military – to stand up for Ethiopia. It was left to the people – the grassroots – to keep the country alive, and this they did.

Today, still, an Ethiopianist elite is largely absent. This is not surprising – political elites cannot appear overnight – it takes years, maybe generations. Having completed its suicide by 1991, and then having been prevented from rising up since then by the EPRDF, the Ethiopian nationalist elite remains a small, sick, disabled child which has lost all connection to its ancestors.
Is this a result solely of the EPRDF repression of the opposition which we all know about? Certainly not. Were it so, the elite would have strongly manifested itself in the diaspora, outside of the reach of the EPRDF. It has not. Another piece of evidence is the Kinijit fiasco of 2007, which was caused mainly because of elite immaturity and resulting infighting within Kinijit, which was that period’s manifestation of the Ethiopianist elite.

This for me is clear evidence that it is the Ethiopian nationalist political suicide of 1960-1991 that has resulted in its demise. Therefore the idea that many have that EPRDF repression is the cause of the poor state of the Ethiopianist elite, and that if the repression would end all would be fine, is wrongheaded. It was a long and complicated demise and it will take a long and complicated course to resurrect this elite. In the meantime, much of the Ethiopian population remains hungry for nationalist leadership.

So where does this leave those of us Ethiopianists who would like positive change in Ethiopian politics? Those of us who would like a reduction in ethnic nationalism, a reduction in repression, corruption, immorality, and injustice, a platform for safely and constructively discussing and competing policies. Those of us who would like Ethiopia to, at the minimum, be governed by a government that is actually liked by the people. At least a nationalist or populist government. Where does this leave those of us who would like this?

Well, obviously the straightforward path of organizing movements and parties is out of the question. This would result in swift imprisonment and torture, and maybe even death. Since the opposition elite is weak from 50 years of suicide, it cannot hope to directly struggle its way through such repression. This is what the past 26 years of experience shows.

The only possible path is the one that is not direct – the one that involves joining the current political system – joining the EPRDF in other words – and struggling from within. Making the EPRDF itself the vehicle for change since the EPRDF is the only political institution today with the capacity to bring about change and with an experienced elite.

Impossible, the cynics say! The TPLF, representing 8% of the population, will never allow that. Actually, it is quite possible, precisely because if the 92% is only slightly competent, even the superb 8% cannot dominate it. Like Putin worked on the inside and rose all the way to President and changed Russia 180 degrees, those who want change in Ethiopia can do the same. Of course, it will require those who are as wise as serpents and innocent as doves. One has to go along with the party, slowly accumulating political capital and power along the way, not rocking the boat, so to speak, until reaching a level of power which allows him the freedom to enforce his will. At the same time, someone with a good conscience can, while obeying broad party directives, avoid perpetrating injustice and repression, and indeed even rescuing those who might be ill affected by cruel and immoral party cadres. This requires a high level of political maturity and skill – it’s a difficult task. But it remains the only way forward now. Simply waiting for divine intervention or some kind of revolt is akin to doing nothing. Or worse than that – it is waiting for a disaster that we cannot cope with.

So, in my opinion, for those who are interested in bringing positive change to Ethiopian politics, today, there is no other vehicle but the EPRDF. The alternative political elite still hasn’t recovered from 50 years of suicide – it doesn’t exist in Ethiopia nor in the diaspora nor anywhere else. Therefore, rather than beating our heads against a wall trying to do the impossible, trying to mobilize international pressure or trying to build yet another failing opposition movement, let us get in the inside and begin a slow movement of taking over the EPRDF.

The ANDM Disconnect

During and after the 2016 protests, we often heard various ANDM officials claim that one of the main causes of unrest in Amhara State was the ‘disconnect’ between ANDM the party and the people of Amhara State. The people do not consider ANDM as having come from them, as being part of them, as wanting the same things that they want, as representing them, as standing up for their interests, etc. To put it simply, ANDM and the people of Amhara State are not of one mind nor of one heart.

This diagnosis of the unrest is, in my opinion is, not only correct, but perfect – it strikes at the very heart of the matter. Politics is best when a people are, among themselves, of one mind and heart, and when a people and its leadership are of one mind and one heart. Politics is at its worst when a people are divided amongst themselves and divided from their leadership. Division is the single biggest enemy of peaceful and prosperous politics and civil life.

Note that by division I don’t mean that there should not be differences. Differing ideologies, opinions, or even interests, to some extent, are natural. There almost ought to be differing ideologies, opinions, and interests. However, a people and leadership of one mind and one heart have a level of trust and understanding that allows them to handle these differences in an agreed upon peaceful and effective manner. So the differences do not end up resulting in division! The people and their leadership realize that at the end of the day, they have to live together and that therefore their basic interests are intertwined. They have to cooperate on basic issues and must not cross certain lines that lead to division. This is what being of one heart and mind is about.
So, yes, in Amhara State, there is division between the people and their leadership. ANDM is disconnected (was never really connected in the first place) from the people of Amhara State. What’s the consequence of this disconnect? Well, in general, it’s poor governance – ineffective government, corruption, injustice, etc. But specific to Ethiopia’s current political problems, the consequence is a disproportionately weak ANDM and Amhara State, and a disproportionately weak Ethiopian nationalism.

Is this a problem for the EPRDF as a whole? What’s wrong if ANDM is weak, if Amhara State is politically weak, and if Ethiopian nationalism is weak? There are those diehard fundamentalists in the EPRDF who do not see it as a problem. Their answer to every problem and situation is to stay the course because they have been in power for 26 years and they know what they are doing! For them, the 2016 protests are just another temporary setback which will be soon forgotten. But for forward thinking members of the EPRDF, who are well aware that the EPRDF has made numerous changes over its history, the 2016 protests indicate that significant changes are required for the EPRDF to continue in power. And one of these changes is that parties other than the TPLF – such as ANDM – have to shoulder their proper share of responsibility and exercise their proper share of power.

Why can’t the TPLF go it alone, so to speak, as it has for a quarter decade so far? The reason is that it is now clear that the vanguard party developmental state (10 years old) – which today is the EPRDF’s main policy and instrument of survival – and ethnic federalism (23 years old) and are incompatible. Not only incompatible, but a combustible combination – combustible enough to blow up the EPRDF’s hold on power. The EPRDF being a TPLF-led vanguard party, in other words with the TPLF holding most of the power and the other parties such as ANDM being junior partners, cannot sustain the developmental state because the resulting ethnic resentment will be too much handle. Therefore, ANDM (and OPDO and SEPDM etc.) need to have more weight in the EPRDF, so that the EPRDF is no longer a TPLF-led front, and thereby anti-TPLF and anti-Tigrean resentment will be slowly reduced. If ANDM and the others continue to be weak and estranged from its people, anti-TPLF resentment will continue increasing and the EPRDF’s hold on power will be weakened.

In order for ANDM to carry its weight in the EPRDF, it must be reconciled with the people of Amhara State. How can this be done? The first step would be for ANDM leadership to understand and accept that their political survival requires such reconciliation. The second is to bring about reconciliation via good governance and so make good governance the focus of their (perpetual!) mandate. Wait a minute – how is this possible? Corruption and favouritism are natural to the one party developmental state. All politicians in a developmental state have to have clients and networks and patronage, otherwise they will be unable to survive. As we have seen in Ethiopia, trying to achieve good governance is always a losing battle in a one party developmental state. Actually, let alone in Ethiopia, the Chinese Communist Party has for 40 years found it impossible to deal effectively with poor governance. Given this, how can ANDM bring about good governance?

The answer is that ANDM must first realize that 1) their survival is today very tenuous; 2) reconciling with the people of Amhara State their only hope for survival; and 3) given the current political reality in Ethiopia good governance is ANDM’s only way to bring about reconciliation. ANDM has no choice – in order to survive, it must reconcile with its people, and in order to reconcile, it must bring about good governance – peace, justice, transparency, no corruption, no favouritism, and a focus on aligning policy with the interests of the public.
What will the TPLF say about this? Will it not consider an ANDM united with the people of Amhara State as a threat? Will it not interfere in Amhara State? Let me say it clearly – the TPLF does not have a choice in the matter. If ANDM reconciles with its population – or simply just makes the decision to do so – there is nothing the TPLF can do about it. Unless there are federal issues at stake, the TPLF has to leave the management of Amhara State to ANDM. If it interferes, it is going to have to literally colonize Amhara State with Tigreans, something which it has not done to date and which it will not do, since this will result in a revolt it cannot control. Note that the EPRDF had a hard time controlling the 2016 revolt even though it was as much an anti-ANDM as anti-TPLF revolt. But if ANDM is one with the population, then the EPRDF would have to give in to ANDM’s wishes.

Let me add here that even today, the TPLF is not the direct cause of corruption, favouritism, injustice, etc. in Amhara State. The TPLF’s tentacles do not and more importantly cannot directly reach the local level. To put it simply, if the administrators of, say, Debre Marqos woreda, are corrupt and inefficient and do not represent the will of the people, this is a problem between them and the people, and a problem that can be fixed between them. The administrators are not from the TPLF, neither is their security from the TPLF. In most cases the administrators and the security apparatus are neighbours and relatives of the people of Debre Marqos. I use this example to illustrate that if ANDM and the people of Amhara State have the will, it is possible for ANDM to reconcile with the people of Amhara State. There will be no interference from the TPLF.

What will be the consequence of this reconciliation? It means that ANDM will have a significant increase in its political power. That is, it will be able to mobilize its people much more effectively than it can now, and this ability to mobilize is the basis of political power. This increase in political power will mean that ANDM will no longer be a junior partner in the EPRDF relative to the TPLF. This is the key to its survival. Again, understanding that this is the key to its survival is what should motivate it to change.

Will not the TPLF resist? Of course, there will be parts of the TPLF, the old guard, who will resist, but they will be unable to. Why? The TPLF is a minority whose dominance is solely a result of their unity and the disunity of the majority. Just a slight increase in the level of unity amongst the majority is enough to overcome any resistance some factions in the TPLF may try to put up. If ANDM and the people of Amhara State are reconciled, that is, if there is unity in Amhara State, the TPLF simply can no longer dominate. And many in the TPLF know this very well. In addition, note that, as I mentioned above, there is a part of the TPLF that wants to relinquish their dominance because it understands that this dominance is the biggest source of anti-EPRDF resentment and that if this dominance continues, both the TPLF and its Tigrean constituency will be at great risk. The problem is that they don’t see any political force, include ANDM and the other junior partners in the EPRDF, that is ready to take over the power that the TPLF relinquishes. But if ANDM does its job and becomes hand and glove with the people of Amhara State, then TPLF dominance will decrease in an orderly and stable manner, and in a roundabout way the survival of the EPRDF and TPLF will be reassured.

One Heart’ (‘And Lb’) should become the new slogan of ANDM. Everyone at all levels should be required so sign on to this. This is the only way for ANDM to repair the disconnect with the people of Amhara State and to become one with the people. This in turn is the only way ANDM can survive. Most importantly, this is key to the survival of the Ethiopian nation.

Monday, 29 August 2016

ፑቲኖቻችን የት አሉ?

2008/12/6 ዓ.ም. (2016/8/12)

የሶቪዬት ህብረት ከወደቀ ብኋላ ምእራቡ ዓለም በተለይ አሜሪካ ሩሲያኖችን እንረዳችኋለን፤ ኤኮኖሚአችሁ እንዲታደስና እንዲያድግ እንረዳችኋለን፤ ወደ ዓለም ኤኮኖሚ በቀላሉ እንድትቀላቀሉ እናደርጋለን፤ የቀዝቃዛ ጦርንነትን ለማፍረስ ስለተባበራችሁን ሩሲያ በጠቅላላ እንድትበለጽግ እናደርጋለን ብለው ቃላቸውን ሰጡ። ነገር ግን ቃላቸውን አጥፈው በሩሲያ ሀገር አፍራሽና ህዝብ ጎጂ የሆነ አመራርና መርህ በሀገሪቷ እንዲሰፍን ገፋፉ። በዚህ ምክንያት የሩሲያ ህዝብ የአስር ዓመት በላይ የስቃይ ዘመን አሳለፈ። ስቃይ ስል ህዝቡ ደህይቶ የሚበላውን ያጣበት፤ ወንጀልና ሽብርተኝነት የሰፈነበት፤ ህዝቡ ጤና አጥቶ የአማካኝ የህይወት እድሜ ከ70 ወደ60 የወረደበት፤ ሙስናና የማፊያ (ትብብር ወንጀል) ሥረዓት የሞላበት ሀገር ሆና ነበር ሩሲያ።

በዚህ የሩሲያ ስቃይ ዘመን የሀገሪቷ መሪ ፕሬዚደንት ቦሪስ ዬልትሲን ነበሩ። በ1991ዓ.ም. ከስልጣን በፈቃዳቸው ወረዱና ምክትላቸውን ቨላዲሚር ፑቲንን ፕሬዚደንት እንዲሆን ወከሉ። የዬልትሲን ደጋፊዎች የሆኑት በመንግስት አመራር ውስጥ የነበሩት ትላልቅ ባለ ሀብቶች የውጭ ሀገር «ንጂኦ» አንቀሳቃሾች የምዕራብ ሀገር መንግስታት ሁሉም ፑቲን በአስተሳብም በርዕዮት ዓለምም በእምነትም የዬልትሲን ተቃራኒ እንደሆነ ዓገር ወዳጅ እንደሆነ አልጠረጠሩም ነበር! በኢትዮጵያ ሁናቴ ለማምሳሰል ያህል መለስ ዜናዊ ይልቃል ጌትነትን ወይም ሌላ ተቃዋሚ ሾሙ እንደማለት ነው!

ይህ እንዴት ሊሆን ቻለ? እንዴት ዬልትሲንና ዙሪያቸው ያሉት መሪዎች ደጋፊዎች ባለሟሎችና የውጭ ሀገር መንግስታት የፑቲንን የእውነት ባህሪና አቋም አላወቁም? ምክንያቱ ቀላል ነው፤ ፑቲን እራሱን አላገለጠም። ማንነቱን በሚያስፈልገው መጠን ሰውሮ ነበር። ይልቁኑ በዬልትሲን መንግስት በተለያየ ቦታዎች ሲያገለግል ጎልማሳው ፑቲን በታታሪነትና በዓለቃን ማክበርና በተለይ ለዓለቃ ያለው ታማኝነት ነበር የሚታወቀው። ከአመራር ወስጥ ያሉትና ከየሀገሩ ገዥ የነበሩት ባለሃብቶች («የሩሲያ ቢሊዮኔሮች» የተባሉት) በደምብ ይግባባ ነበር። ከመጠን በላይ ብልጥም ፖሊቲካ የገባውም ነበር። በፍጹም አልተጠረጠረም!

ቨላዲሚር ፑቲን ፕሬዚደንትም ሲሆኑ የእውነት አቋሞቻቸውን ወድያው አላሳዩም። በመጀመርያ ስልጣናቸውን ቀስ በቀስ አጠናከሩ። ጓደኛ እንጂ ጠላት የማያፈራ መርህዎችን አራመዱ። አሸባሪዮችን አጠቁና የጦርሰራዊት የፖሊስና የጸጥታ ኃይሎችን ድጋፍ አረጋገጡ። ከምዕራብ ሀገሮች ጋር በጸረ ሽብርተኝነት ሩሲያ በደምብ እንድትተባር አደረጉና የምዕራብ መንግስታትንም ድጋፍ አገኙ። ከዚያ ቆይተው ፑቲን ስልጣናቸውን ካረጋገጡ በኋላ በዬልትሲን ዘመን በዝርፍያና በሙስና ያደጉት ባለሀብቶችን በማሳሰር በማሳመን ስልጣናቸውን ነጠቁ አጠፉ። እነዚህ እርምጃዎች የፑቲንን የህዝብ ድጋፍ መጠን በጣም እንዲልቅ አደረጉ (ስልጣን ከያዙ ጅምሮ ከ65 እስቀ 80 በመቶ ድጋር አላቸው)።

ከዬልትሲን ወደ ፑቲን የተካሄደው የሩሲያ ለውጥ ከሞላ ጎደል ሰላማዊ ነበር። እንዲሁም በኢትዮጵያ የሚፈለገው ሰላማዊ፤ ማንም የማይጠቃበት፤ ሀገር የማይረበሽበት፤ ጥላቻ የማይሰፍንበት፤ ቅራኔ የምያሳንስና መግባባት ለዘብተኝነት መቻቻል የምያጠቃልል ለውጥ ነው።

እንደዚህ አይነት ለውጥ የሚመጣው ከዓብዮት ሳይሆን ከውስጣዊ ቀስ በቀስ የሚመጣ ለውጥ ነው። ለንደዚህ አይነት ለውት የነባር መንግስት ውስጥ በርካታ የለውጥ አጋሮች ያስፈልጋሉ፦ ፑቲኖች ያስፈልጋሉ! ሥርዓቱ ሲናጋ ውግያና ሁከት ለማምጣት ወደኋላ የማይሉ አክራሪዮች ስልጣን እንድይዙ ውይም በውሳኔ ላይ እንዲያመዝኑ ያደርጋል። ይህ እንዳይከሰት እነዚህ የውስጥ ለውጥ የሚፈልጉ ለዘብተኛ የሆኑት አስፈላጊ ናቸው። አክራሪውም በለዘብተኛው እንደተከበበ ሲያይ ግድ ይመለሳል።

ነገር ግን እንደዚህ ሰርጎ ገብተው የሚያገለግሉ ሰዎች የራሳቸውን ህልውና ለመጠበቅና ይበልጥ ረጅም አላማቸው እንዳይከሽፍ ብለው እራሳቸውን መደበቅ አለባቸው። እዚህ ላይ ብልጠት ያስፈልጋል። መሪዎቻቸውን መምሰል አለባቸው። አለጊዘው ስልጣናቸውና የስልጣን ድራቸውን በቂ ሳያስፋፉ ሳያጠነክሩ ጠንካራ አቋም መውሰድ የለባቸውም። እንደ ፑቲን ስያስፈልግ አንገታቸውን ደፍተው መኖር አለእባቸው። «እንደ እባብ ብልዖች እንደ ርግብ የዋሃን ሁኑ» ውይም «ዛሬ ህይወትን ካጡ ወደፊት መታግል አይቻልም» እንደሚባለው።

በዚህ ጊዜ ብዙሐናም «ተቃዋሚዎች»ም ብልህ መሆን አለባቸው። ከውስጥ የስውር ጠቃዎሚዎች በይፋ እየተሟገቱ በስውር መተባበር አለባቸው። አንድ ነገር ማስታወስ አለብን፤ ዋናው የኢትዮጵያ ፖሊቲካ ችግር የተሳትፎ ጉዳይ ነው። ህዝቡ መሪውን ሲጠላ ከመንግስት ወስጥ ከመሳተፍ ይርቃል። «ፖለቲካና ኮሬንቲ» የሚባለው ስሜት ያመዝናል። ይህ ማለት በርካታ የኢትዮጵያ ህዝብ ወገኑን ውይም የሃሳብ አጋሩን ከመንግስት ወስጥ የለም። በታችኞቹ የመንግስት አካሎችም እንደ ቀበሌና ወረዳ ለመሳትፍ አይፈልግም ቤተሰቡም ዘመዱም እንዲሳተፍ አይፈልግም። መንግስትን «ለሌሎች» ትቶት በብአድ እየተገዛ ነው። ይህ አስተሳሰብ ተገቢ የሆነ የታሪክ ምክንያት ቢኖረውም ትክክል አይደለምም እጅግ ጎጂም ነው። አለመሳተፍ አክራሪነትንና ዓብዮትን የሚጋብዝ ለዘብትኘትና ትብብርን ቦታ የሚያሳጣ አስተሳሰብ ነው።

«እንዴት ኢህአዴግ ውስጥ መስራት ይቻላል፤ ሕሊናን መሸጥ ወይም ጥቃትን መቀበል ያስፈልጋል» ሊባል ይችላል። ታድያ በሰሞኑን የጎንደር ተቃውሞ ላይ የኃይል እርምጃ እንዳይወሰድ ያደረጉት ማን ናቸው? አልፎ ተርፎ በኢትዮጵያ ጦር ሰራዊት ወስጥ ያሉት በዝቅተኛ የስልጣን ደረጃ ያሉት ወታደሮች በአብዛኛው ማናቸው ከየት ናቸውም? በየቀበለውና ወረዳ የሚያስተዳደሩት (ከትግራይ ክልል በስተቀር) ማናቸው? የታወቀው ኢህአዴግን ለቆ የወጣው ኤርሚያስ ለገሰ ማን ነው? አምባሳደር ሆኖ በግዞት ወደ ቱርኪ የተላኩት አቶ አያሌው ጎበዜ ማን ናቸው? ለነገሩ ኃይለ ማርያም ደሳለኝ ማናቸው? እነዚህ በሙሉ የለውጥ አጋሮች ወይም ሁኔታዎች ሲፈቅዱ የለውጥ አጋሮች ሊሆኑ የሚችሉ ናቸው!

መርሳት የለለብን የኢህአዴግ መንግስት የአናሳ መንግስት እንደሆነ ነው (በዚህ ካልተስማማን የህዝበ ድጋፍ አላቸው ብለን አመንን ማለት ነው!)። ኢህአዴግ መላ የኢትዮጵያን ህዝብን እንወክላለን ባይ ነው ግን ተቃዋሚዎችና በርካታ ህዝብ የትግራይ መንግስት ነው ብሎ ይከሰዋል። አናሳ ነው ብለን ከተቀበልን ማውቅ ያለብን አናሳ መንግስት ሀገርን መግዛት የሚችለው ሌላው ህዝብ ከፈቀደለትና በደምብ ከተባበረው ብቻ ነው! ኢህአዴግ እንደ ደርግ አለብልሃት በመጭፍለቅ ብቻ መግዛት አይችልም። ኢህአዴግ የሌላው አለመተባበር ውይም ከፖሊቲካ መራቅ ውይም በፈቃደኝነት መገዛት ያስፈልገዋል። ይህ ውነታን በግልፅ የሚያንጸባርቀው ኢህአዴግ ፓርቲውም ጦርሰራዊቱም በቁጥር ደረጃ በአብዛኛው የትግርኛ ተናጋሪ አለመሆኑ ነው።

ስለዚህ ኢህአዴግ ውስጥ ገብቶ ወዲያው ሳይሆን ከስ ብሎ ልውጥ ማምጣት ካልሆነም የለውጥ አጋር መሆን እንደሚቻል ግልፅ ነው። ህዝቡ ይግባ፤ ይሳተፍ፤ ሲያስፈልግ አንገቱን ደፍቶ እሺ ይበል፤ ቀስ ብሎ በስልጥ አብዛኛነትን ያረጋግጥና ጊዘው ሲደርስ ለውጥ ያመጣል።

ከፑቲን የምንማረው ትምህርት የህ ነው። ፑቲን ለዬልትሲን መንግስት ሲያገለግል ብቸኛ የውስጥ ተቃዋሚ አልነበሩም ሊሆኑም አይችሉም ነበር። ፕሪዚደንት ፑቲን ሲሾሙ እንድርሱ አንገታቸውን ደፍተው የመትፎ አገዛዙን ውስጥ ለውስጥ የሚሸረሽሩ ሀገር ወዳድ ይሆኑ ትናንሽ ፑቲኖች አብረው ተነሱና ፑቲንን ደግፈው አላማቸውን አራመዱ። ፑቲን ብቻቸውን ቢሆኑና የሳቸውን አላማ የሚደግፍ ከሥርዓቱ ውስጥ ባይኖሩ የትም አይደርስም ነበር።

በተዘዋዋሪ በሰሞኑ በአማራ ክልል በተካሄደው ተቃውሞ ሰልፎች ምክንያት አንዳንድ የህወሓት ተንታኒዎች ብአዴን በሰላይዎችና በከሃዲውች የተሞላ ነውና ጽዳት (በሌላ ቃል እስራና ግድያ) ያስፈልገዋል ብለው ይተቻሉ! ውነት ነው ህወሓት ለ26 ዓመት በመግዛቱ በፖሊቲካ ስልጥ ከሌላው ልቋልና እንደዚህ አይነት ነገር ቶሎ ነው የሚገባው። ሌላውም ሊገባው ይገባል።

መጀመርያ የታተመው ከዚህ